No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
After nearly a full day of trading, the numbers told a disappointing story. As of 10:00 am UTC on October 17, only 848.63 million WLFI tokens (worth $12.7 million based on the presale price) had been sold. That left an enormous 19.1 billion coins unsold, representing a whopping $287 million in unmet expectations. The first-day sales accounted for just 4.24% of the total supply.
But how did a token linked to a figure as notorious as Trump flop so badly? Here are five factors that might explain the underwhelming debut.
One of the most significant hurdles for the WLFI token was the strict restrictions on who could buy it. Unlike most token presales that are open to the public, Trump’s DeFi token was only available to accredited U.S. investors or non-residents of the United States.
Visitors to the token’s website had to verify whether they met the requirements of an accredited investor, which under U.S. law, means earning over $200,000 annually, having a net worth exceeding $1 million, or holding a senior position at a company issuing unregistered securities. These restrictions eliminated the vast majority of U.S. residents from participating.
Although non-U.S. residents could bypass the accredited investor requirement, they still had to provide proof of residency outside the U.S., further complicating the buying process. This limitation likely alienated a significant portion of Trump’s supporter base, many of whom are U.S.-based and not accredited investors.
In a surprising departure from typical cryptocurrency behavior, WLFI cannot be transferred from one wallet to another. This means that investors can’t sell or trade the token, cutting off the potential for profit from resale. In fact, the only thing token holders can do is wait for the future DeFi protocol to launch, when they will supposedly be able to vote on governance proposals.
This inability to trade or transfer WLFI discouraged many from participating in the sale. Without the liquidity and speculative opportunities that typically drive cryptocurrency trading, many potential buyers were left questioning the value of holding WLFI.
Even for the relatively small number of buyers who did want to purchase WLFI, the website couldn’t handle the traffic. Several users reported encountering error messages when trying to buy the token, being met with a frustrating “this page isn’t working” message.
A website crash during a highly publicized launch is never a good look. Potential investors who experienced technical difficulties may have reconsidered their purchase altogether, compounding the token’s lackluster performance.
Trump’s WLFI token faced criticism even before the sale began. Some observers believed that the project was nothing more than a cash grab, designed to capitalize on Trump’s name without offering genuine value.
Although the non-transferability of the token is stated in the website’s fine print, critics suggested this key detail was buried to push more sales. Trump’s announcement of the token was so controversial on X (formerly Twitter) that it received a community note warning potential buyers that they would be unable to transfer or sell the token.
This skepticism likely contributed to the sluggish sales, as investors hesitated to buy into a project that many saw as dubious.
The final hurdle for WLFI’s launch was the complexity of the purchasing process. Even accredited investors had to pass a Know Your Customer (KYC) check before buying, which required them to upload personal documents such as a passport or driver’s license. For privacy-conscious investors, the requirement to trust a third-party KYC provider, Sumsub, may have been a dealbreaker.
Moreover, some buyers may have been unsure of their status as accredited investors or uncertain about how to navigate the system, especially given the confusing layout of the website. These roadblocks likely discouraged many from completing their purchases, further dampening sales.
Despite the dismal first-day sales, Trump’s influence in the U.S. crypto community remains strong. His political action committee raised $7.5 million in crypto donations between July and September 2024, according to the Federal Election Commission. Trump’s political opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, has also been trying to court crypto voters by promising a balanced regulatory approach.
As for WLFI, the future remains uncertain. While the token may have stumbled out of the gate, Trump’s supporters could rally behind it in the coming months—assuming the DeFi protocol it promises ever materializes.
Until then, the world will be watching to see if this high-profile token launch can rebound from its shaky start.
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
BACK TO HOME PAGE
One of the most alarming issues that Sinder points out is the prevalence of pump and dump schemes. These are orchestrated efforts where the price of a cryptocurrency is artificially inflated through false promotion, only to be dumped by insiders once the price peaks, leaving ordinary investors holding worthless tokens.
Sinder explains, “Many exchanges and so-called listing services prey on projects desperate for exposure. They hype up tokens through manipulative practices and create short-lived price spikes, leading to a crash as soon as the insiders cash out. The unfortunate reality is that most of these tokens never recover, and the investors, along with the project creators, are left to bear the brunt of the damage.”
Another major concern for crypto projects is the high cost of getting listed on certain exchanges. Sinder says that many of these platforms promise access to a large user base but fail to deliver any meaningful results once the listing is complete. “Some exchanges will charge hundreds of thousands of dollars for a listing, yet offer no marketing support, no liquidity, and no genuine market exposure,” Sinder points out.
These fees can drain a project’s resources, and without a proper return on investment, many promising tokens are left struggling to gain traction. For smaller projects, especially those in their early stages, this can be the difference between success and failure.
Sinder urges token creators and developers to be cautious when choosing platforms to list their coins. He emphasises the importance of conducting thorough due diligence before committing to any service. “There are legitimate exchanges out there, but the challenge is separating the genuine platforms from the scams. Always research the platform’s reputation, look at its track record with other token listings, and beware of any service that makes unrealistic promises.”
In addition to financial costs, the reputational damage associated with being involved in a pump and dump scheme can be devastating for a cryptocurrency project. “Trust in your project can erode overnight if you’re seen as participating in fraudulent activities, even unknowingly. It’s crucial to protect your brand and your community by being vigilant.”
At Football Goal Coin, Sinder and his team take a more measured approach to growing their platform. Rather than rushing to list on any exchange, they focus on building a solid foundation and attracting organic growth. “We’re not interested in paying huge sums for quick, empty exposure. Instead, we’re focused on partnerships and listings that actually benefit our users and support long-term value,” Sinder says.
Manny Sinder’s views on listing websites and exchanges serve as a reminder for anyone involved in cryptocurrency to stay cautious. The allure of instant visibility can sometimes lead to costly mistakes, both financially and reputationally. By conducting proper research and being selective with listing platforms, crypto projects can avoid the pitfalls of scams and ensure they’re building a solid foundation for future success.
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
BACK TO HOME PAGE